SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR, MAHANADI COALFIELDS LIMITED — Appellant Vs. SRI RABINDRANATH CHOUBEY — Respondent ( Before: Arun Mishra, M.R. Shah and Ajay Rastogi, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No. 9693 of 2013 Decided on: 27-05-2020 Download: Full Judgement A. Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1978 – Rule 34.3 – Payment of […]
We are providing training in Payroll, Salary Structure, PF-ESI Challan, Bonus, TDS-Form 16 & more: HR-Generalist-Practical-Training: https://oneclik.in/hr-generalist-practical-training/ (PF, ESI, Bonus, Payroll & more) Labour-Law-Practical-Training: https://oneclik.in/labour-law-practical-training/ (Factory, Contact Labor, Maternity Act & more) PF – ESI Consultant Service: https://oneclik.in/pf-esi-consultant-service/ To get connected & for latest HR, IR, Labor Law Updates: Join our Telegram Channel for Latest HR – IR – Labor Law Updates
The Madras High Court has observed a solitary allegation of intemperate language against a woman employee does not constitute an offence under the law on sexual harassment at workplace and the act cannot be allowed to be misused with exaggerated or non-existent charges. Granting relief to a senior central government official who was accused of
Intemperate language no offence under sexual harassment act: Madras HC Read More »
Employees‘ contribution to EPF and ESIC deposited beyond the due date prescribed under section 36(1)(va) would not be eligible for deduction even if deposited before the due date of filing the return of income tax under section 139(1): Madras High Court short overview: Employees’ contribution to EPF and ESIC deposited beyond the due date prescribed under section 36(1)(va) would not be eligible for deduction even if deposited before the due date of filing the return of income tax under section 139(1). Therefore appeal of Revenue was allowed. Issue arose under consideration as to
